BIA Pulls A Fast One With New Secretarial Election Rule

The Bureau of Indian Affairs recently announced its final rule regarding Secretarial elections for federally recognized tribes.  The final rule purports to clarify how tribes may remove IRA constitutional provisions requiring Secretarial elections for constitutional amendments.

The BIA claims that its new rule furthers tribal self-governance and self-determination. That may be true, at least absent tribal chicanery.  The BIA also claims that this rule protects urban Indian voting rights.  But in reality, the rule does no such thing.  

Will SCOTUS Double Down Against Tribal Courts In Dollar General?

By Jared Miller

Last week, U.S. Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch remarked on the success of a pilot program allowing select tribes to prosecute non-Indians for domestic violence under the reauthorized Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).

“[Y]ou demonstrated that with greater control over your own lands and closer partnership with the federal government, justice can and will be done,” Lynch said of the Tulalip and Pascua Yaqui tribes for their efforts during the test period.  The comments are remarkable for at least two reasons. 

Marijuana Tribes: Beware of the DEA's Trojan Horse

In 2013, I published "Federal Task Force: Indian Country's Trojan Horse," explaining:

Beware of the federal task force. . . . [T]he federal task force is a Trojan Horse when it enters Indian country. That is because hiding within the federal task force are state and local cops.

his dynamic is especially prevalent with federal drug task forces.  In fact, the first federal task force comprised in pertinent part by state and local cops, were DEA-led drug task forces.  As the DEA explains