Gabe Galanda Contributes Essay to Book Honoring Legacy of Vine Deloria, Jr.

Gabe Galanda is among the Indigenous contributors whose work appears in a new collection of essays about one of the most influential thinkers of our time. Of Living Stone: Perspectives on Continuous Knowledge and the Work of Vine Deloria, Jr. features more than 30 original pieces by Indigenous leaders, artists, scientists, activists, scholars, legal experts, and humorists, in tribute to Deloria.

Gabe’s essay is titled, “In the Spirit of Vine Deloria, Jr.: Indigenous Kinship Renewal and Relational Sovereignty.” Gabe heeds Deloria’s inspiring call for the renewal of Indigenous kinship tradition and counsels for what Gabe calls “relational sovereignty,” whereby Indigenous human existence is exalted and protected over individual power and profit.

His Deloria tribute essay is among a series of scholarly essays that Gabe has published since 2023 about existential challenges facing Indigenous peoples:

Gabe Galanda is an Indigenous rights attorney and the managing lawyer at Galanda Broadman. He has been named to Best Lawyers in America in the fields of Native American Law and Gaming Law from 2007 to 2024, and dubbed a Super Lawyer by his peers from 2013 to 2024.

Decolonizing Indigenous Fashion

Image from Women's Wear Daily (WWD.com)

Next month SWAIA’s Santa Fe Native Fashion Week[1] takes its rightful place on the fashion calendar, sharing an already prestigious sartorial “first week in May” with the Met Gala. The two events represent an important dichotomy in today’s fashion industry – the former showcasing how centuries of sustainable Indigenous knowledge and design are informing innovative current Indigenous fashion; the latter the penultimate annual fete of a mainstream fashion industry largely built on centuries of colonial exploitation of resources. You will see beautiful clothes at both events. Dazzling works of art made with the finest materials by artisans whose hearts speak through their needles and thread, and stunning people wearing them.

You will also see Indigenous people at both events; but only in Santa Fe will you find a celebration of Indigenous fashion and the opportunity to gather with designers who seek to develop sustainable fashion businesses and create value for their communities.

The Indigenous designers preparing to show at Santa Fe Native Fashion Week consistently express profound appreciation for the cultural influences that contribute to and inform their designs. Many describe learning their craft from loving matriarchs who instilled in them the importance of using it not just to better their own lives, but to build economic opportunity for their People and for future generations. Western practices now known as “sustainable fashion” emerged in the countercultures of the 1960’s and ‘70’s, became a source of consumer advocacy against corporations like Nike’s use of sweatshop labor in the 1990’s, and launched a global Fashion Revolution[2] following the collapse of Bangladesh’s Rana Plaza garment factory complex in 2013.

But Indigenous fashion predates these movements. It exists as a feature of the original triple bottom line economy; one colonization seeks to extinguish, but which has survived and thrived, nevertheless. As Carol Anne Hilton, MBA, Founder & CEO of the Indigenomics Institute, points out, “Indigenous economies are the original sharing economy, the original green economy, regenerative economy, collaborative economy, circular economy, impact economy, and the original gift economy. The indigenous economy is the original social economy .”[3]

Events like Santa Fe Native Fashion Week and the many Indigenous fashion weeks around the globe in recent years highlight a growing consumer demand for authentic Indigenous design. With increased awareness and activism making it more difficult for corporations to exploit Indigenous creators or pass off fake Native designs, the demand presents a significant opportunity for Indigenous fashion designers to activate “the ‘culture-of-origin effect,’ a term that reflects the strategic use of tribal culture as a way to increase the value of goods originating from American Indian entrepreneurs.”[4] And as Indigenous fashion designers start and grow their businesses, there is a corollary need for lawyers who understand and appreciate the ethos behind their work. Only with that understanding can an advisor and advocate help embed principles of “ethical responsibilities toward creation,”[5] community, and decolonization into negotiated transactions and business strategy. After all, “[i]t is the brave and true organization that goes above and beyond the expediency of mere legal compliance to practice what is right and just.”[6] It is the dynamic legal and business team that can help make that happen.

Take, for instance, a collaboration and licensing agreement between a large corporation and an Indigenous designer (think: PRL x Naiomi Glasses (Dine)). These contracts, which have historically been used - where a written agreement was reached at all – to legitimize the theft and exploitation of Indigenous design, offer significant opportunities to activate what Eighth Generation Founder, Louie Gong, calls the Decolonizing Partnership Model.[7]  From negotiating appropriate compensation and exclusivity terms, to ensuring participation and control in the product development and marketing stages, a knowledgeable advocate can ensure an Indigenous fashion designer’s business relationships are built on the principles by which they and their communities have lived for millennia.

I, for one, can’t wait for Santa Fe. I look forward to seeing you there and, if you have a moment, hearing about your Indigenous fashion goals; your pain points; the obstacles you’ve overcome and the ones you’re facing; and, of course,  your latest inspirations. Let’s talk!

Rachel Tobias is of counsel at Galanda Broadman. In addition to supporting the firm’s tribal law and Indigenous rights practice, she represents and advises Indigenous creators on an array of matters. Rachel holds a JD from the University of New Mexico School of Law and an LL.M. in Fashion Law from Fordham University School of Law.

[1] Southwestern Association for Indian Arts. https://swaianativefashion.org

[2] https://www.fashionrevolution.org

[3] Hilton, Carol Anne, MBA. Indigenomics. New Society Publishers, 2021, at 91. https://indigenomicsinstitute.com

[4] Stewart, D., J. Gladstone, A. Verbos, and M. Katragadda. 2014. “Native American Cultural Capital and Business Strategy: The Culture-of-Origin Effect.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 38:4, at 128.

[5] Claw, Carma M., Amy Klemm Verbos, and Grace Ann Rosile, “Business Ethics and Native American Values,” American Indian Business Principles & Practices, edited by Kennedy, Deanna M., et al., University of Washington Press, 2017, at 147.

[6] Id., at 156.

[7] https://eighthgeneration.com/pages/decolonizing-partnership-model#:~:text=A%20Decolonized%20Partnership%20requires%20compensating,capacity%20development%20for%20artists%20partners.

Statement of Gabe Galanda Re: Washington's New NextGen Bar Exam

Washington State’s new lawyer licensure reforms are a step in the right direction, especially with regard to diversifying our state's legal profession.  But those reforms can't come at the expense of Washington-specific subject matters that are intended to broaden our society's access to the legal system. 

In 2002, Washington added federal Indian law to its bar exam, becoming the second state in the country to do so.  New Mexico was the first; South Dakota followed suit, becoming the third.  When Washington moved to the uniform bar exam in 2011, it maintained federal Indian law as a bar exam subject. 

Among the many reasons for adding and keeping federal Indian law were the need to increase lawyer competence in that arena so that more lawyers would be equipped to help meet the unmet legal needs of Indigenous people and those who interact with Indigenous people in Washington. 

We still have miles to go in that regard.  Indigenous people remain the most underrepresented racial demographic in our state's legal system, for example, with only 1 in 10 Indigenous people's civil legal needs being met by legal counsel.  In other words, 90% of the Indigenous people in our state go unrepresented, including when they need it the most--whether in a child custody, divorce, employment, or eviction matter. 

Because the NextGen exam does not include federal Indian law, it will be incumbent on Washington’s three law schools to ensure that federal Indian law is taught to every law student in our state.  Each of our three schools must make the subject a prerequisite to graduating law school by 2026.

Gabe Galanda is an Indigenous rights attorney and the managing lawyer at Galanda Broadman. He has been named to Best Lawyers in America in the fields of Native American Law and Gaming Law from 2007 to 2024, and dubbed a Super Lawyer by his peers from 2013 to 2024.

Galanda Broadman Litigation Assistant Announcement

Galanda Broadman, PLLC, an Indigenous rights firm with seven lawyers and offices in Seattle and Yakima, Washington, and Bend, Oregon, seeks to add a litigation assistant to our growing team.

Galanda Broadman is an Indigenous owned firm dedicated to advancing tribal and tribal citizen legal rights and tribal business interests.  The firm represents tribal governments, businesses, and citizens in critical litigation, business and regulatory matters, especially in the areas of Treaty rights, tribal sovereignty, land rights, cultural property protection, taxation, commerce, gaming, serious/catastrophic personal injury, wrongful death, disenrollment defense, and Indigenous human/civil rights. 

The litigation assistant primarily assists in Galanda Broadman’s federal court civil rights and wrongful death cases. That individual is involved with every step of the litigation process, from managing new client intake, to filing complaints in state and federal courts, to assisting with public information and discovery requests.

Multi-tasking; technology and research skills; critical and audacious thinking; strong communication; tremendous work ethic; tenacity; and sound ethics are required. 

Salary DOE. 

Galanda Broadman seeks a candidate with relevant experience in legal administrative work. This position could be adjusted for part time or full time. Work is primarily remote, with occasional in-person work required in Seattle.

Qualified applicants should submit a cover letter tailored to this announcement, as well as a résumé, transcript, and list of at least three educational or professional references, to Alice Hall, the firm’s Office Manager, at alice@galandabroadman.com

Applications directed elsewhere will not be considered.

Galanda Broadman Indigenous Human Rights Fellowship Announcement

Galanda Broadman, PLLC, an Indigenous rights firm with seven lawyers and offices in Seattle and Yakima, Washington, and Bend, Oregon, seeks a rising second- or third-year law student to work as an Indigenous Human Rights Fellow during the fall 2024 or spring 2025 semesters.

Galanda Broadman is an Indigenous owned firm dedicated to advancing tribal and tribal citizen legal rights and tribal business interests.  The firm represents tribal governments, businesses, and citizens in critical litigation, business and regulatory matters, especially in the areas of Treaty rights, tribal sovereignty, land rights, cultural property protection, taxation, commerce, gaming, serious/catastrophic personal injury, wrongful death, disenrollment defense, and Indigenous human/civil rights.

We seek Fellows who are deeply committed to representing Indigenous interests; curious and persistent in crafting creative legal strategies; and enthusiastic to dive into an enterprising & fast-moving practice.   We seek students who can commit from 15–40 hours per week for 8–12 weeks for credit or outside funding. We work with students to get class credit from their schools.

Fellows will work throughout all areas of our practice depending on their interests and on the firm’s needs. Fellows will get the chance to work with each member of our team. In the past, projects have included: researching and writing briefing for federal, state, and tribal court litigation; conducting written discovery; working with clients to identify civil rights claims; crafting legislative advocacy materials with Indigenous stakeholders; and developing longer-term research projects and novel strategies for clients. 

Qualified applicants should submit a cover letter tailored to this announcement, as well as a résumé, writing sample, transcript, and list of at least three educational or professional references, to Alice Hall, the firm’s Office Manager, at alice@galandabroadman.com

Applications directed elsewhere will not be considered.

For more information about Galanda Broadman, visit galandabroadman.com.

Galanda Broadman Litigation & Tribal Associate Position Announcement

Galanda Broadman, PLLC, an Indigenous rights firm with seven lawyers and offices in Seattle and Yakima, Washington, and Bend, Oregon, seeks to add an experienced civil litigation associate who is also interested in practicing tribal law.

Galanda Broadman is an Indigenous owned firm dedicated to advancing tribal and tribal citizen legal rights and tribal business interests.  The firm represents tribal governments, businesses, and citizens in critical litigation, business and regulatory matters, especially in the areas of Treaty rights, tribal sovereignty, land rights, cultural property protection, taxation, commerce, gaming, serious/catastrophic personal injury, wrongful death, disenrollment defense, and Indigenous human/civil rights.

The firm seeks a lawyer who are deeply committed to representing Indigenous interests, who is state bar licensed in Washington state or Oregon; and who has civil litigation or a judicial clerk experience.  The lawyer would help bring federal Section 1983 civil rights claims against local governments, federal claims for tribal governments, as well as serve tribal governments as general outside counsel. 

We prefer applicants with at least three years of experience but exceptions can be made for exceptional candidates.  Proven motion and civil rules practice, if not trial, experience, and the ability to self-direct are critical. Impeccable writing and research skills; critical and audacious thinking; strong oral advocacy; tremendous work ethic; tenacity; and sound ethics are required. 

Salary DOE. 

Qualified applicants should submit a cover letter tailored to this announcement, as well as a résumé, writing sample, transcript, and list of at least three educational or professional references, to Alice Hall, the firm’s Office Manager, at alice@galandabroadman.com

Applications directed elsewhere will not be considered.

Gabe Galanda: Inter-Tribal Kinship as a "Durable Source of Strength is Under Duress"

Gabe Galanda has published "Durability and Duress: Inter-Tribal Kinship and Indian Gaming Capitalism," at the invitation of the Arizona State University School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership. 

An excerpt:

Kinship is an Indigenous cultural tradition. It is also a political practice.

Indigenous societies and nations withstood colonization for centuries by wielding the political power of kinship. Inter-Tribal kinship alliances prevented the total annihilation of Indigenous peoples during the colonial and early American eras and defeated threats to Tribal national existence in modern times. Indigenous peoples leveraged kinship first to withstand genocidal wars and territorial assaults and later, U.S. Congressional and Supreme Court attacks.

Today, Indigenous kinship and its inter-Tribal safety net are under duress. National Tribal political practices and federal policies catalyzed by gaming capitalism weaken historical inter-Tribal kinship alliances and jeopardize Tribal nationhood writ large. Tribal per-capitalism has transmuted certain Indigenous peoples into casino enterprises. While Tribal gaming politicians wield per capita dollars to sustain their political prominence, Tribal members clamor for the individual distribution of those monies instead of Indigenous community reinvestment and revitalization.

These intra-Tribal dynamics create a race to the bottom with Tribal gaming politicians seeking to increase unearned per capita income by building new casinos and related amenities in the ancestral homelands of others. Meanwhile, the Obama and Biden administrations’ laissez faire approach to the generation and use of Tribal gaming dollars contributes to the erosion of Indigenous kinship systems. These forces create inter-Tribal division and weaken time-honored kinship alliances.

Unless inter-Tribal territorial and relational balance are restored, the divisions will only broaden and deepen, rendering Tribal nations ill-prepared to defend or preempt the next existential attack.

Gabe Galanda Shares "Tribal-State Collaboration and Compacting" Lessons with Washington State Legislators

Yesterday, Gabe Galanda presented “Tribal-State Collaboration and Compacting,” to the Washington State House of Representatives State Government and Tribal Relations Committee.

Gabe discussed the history of Indigenous relations in the state of Washington, dating back to the Stevens Treaties in the 1850s and the Fish Wars of the early 1970s and carrying forward to the last half-century of increasing state-tribal consultation and collaboration. 

You can watch his presentation here (beginning around minute 40) and view his slides here.

Galanda Broadman Named "Best Firm" in Native American & Gaming Law for Twelfth Year

Galanda Broadman, PLLC, has been named a “Best Law Firm” by U.S. News - Best Lawyers in the arena of Native American Law and Gaming Law, for the twelfth year in a row. 

According to U.S. News - Best Lawyers, the firm's national ranking was determined through the firm's overall evaluation, which was derived from a combination of Galanda Broadman’s “clients' impressive feedback” and “the high regard that lawyers in other firms in the same practice area have for [the] firm.” 

Galanda Broadman is dedicated to advancing Indigenous legal rights and business interests and defending Indigenous human rights.

The firm, with eight lawyers and offices in Seattle and Yakima, Washington and Bend, Oregon, represents Indigenous governments, businesses, and citizens in critical litigation, business and regulatory matters—especially in matters of Treaty rights, sovereignty, taxation, civil rights, and belonging.

Washington Attorney General Continues His War Against The Yakama Treaty 

By Joe Sexton

Washington State Attorney General Bob Ferguson is running for governor next year and he is the clear front-runner according to a recent polling.  Ferguson leads the field among self-identified Democratic voter respondents, with 42% of respondents backing Ferguson over second-place contender Hillary Franz who polled at 16%.  What the polls and the media are not highlighting, though, is Ferguson’s long history of hostility towards Tribes and their Treaty rights. 

In fact, Ferguson’s lack of respect for Tribal treaty rights is so regressive that even Trump-appointed U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch finds it repellant. 

The most glaring evidence of this is found in Ferguson’s continuing open hostilities against the Treaty rights of the Yakama People, a ceaseless conflict with a Yakama business owner waged over several legal battles.  Ferguson has repeatedly lost each and every battle over the last decade. 

Yet he persists in his crusade. 

In what most reasonable people would consider the final nail in the coffin for Ferguson’s contention that the Yakama Treaty Right to Travel does not pre-empt Washington state’s fuel tax scheme, the U.S. Supreme Court handed Ferguson a loss on the issue in 2019.  That decision came after Ferguson lost in the Washington State Supreme Court in 2017 [1], which followed another loss in Yakima County Superior Court. 

At every adjudicative step from an administrative appeal to the highest courts in this state and the nation, Ferguson and the State Department of Licensing (DOL) were told—over and over again—that the Yakama Treaty pre-empts any state law burden on the Yakama People’s right to travel.  Justice Gorsuch wrote in his concurring 2019 opinion that affirming the 1855 Treaty rights of the Yakama People was the least “we can do”:

Really, this case just tells an old and familiar story. The State of Washington includes millions of acres that the Yakamas ceded to the United States under significant pressure. In return, the government supplied a handful of modest promises. The State is now dissatisfied with the consequences of one of those promises. It is a new day, and now it wants more. But today and to its credit, the Court holds the parties to the terms of their deal. It is the least we can do.

One would think a person with any measure of respect for Tribal Treaty rights would get the message by that point.  Ferguson, unfortunately, has not.  To quote a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals opinion—from another Stevens Treaty rights case Ferguson lost before SCOTUS—he still “has a remarkably one-sided view of the Treaties.”  For whatever reason, he and DOL remain “dissatisfied” with the Treaty of 1855.  They are still trying to find a way to undermine its “modest promises”—four years after losing at the U.S. Supreme Court.  

(Governor Stevens with indigenous leaders, Walla Walla Council, May 1855.

Illustration by Gustav Sohon, Courtesy Washington State Historical Society)

Why Ferguson wants to continue his losing battle is unclear.  What is clear is that the fight involves money.  The fight over this issue started back when Barack Obama was president, with a 2013 state tax assessment for $3.6 million against Cougar Den, Inc., a Yakama-member owned business.  A decade later, in 2023, Ferguson claims the Yakama-owned business owes “$34,979,246.89 (excluding penalties and interest).”  To the surprise of no one except perhaps DOL and Ferguson, the state has been handed another loss. 

Once again back before a state administrative law judge (ALJ), a decision was issued on October 2, 2023, finding Ferguson’s dishonest [2] attempts to circumvent and undermine the Yakama Treaty unpersuasive:

Here, it is not possible for the Respondent to remove fuel from a terminal without traveling or transporting that fuel on public highways. Accordingly, the Respondent has met its burden to establish that, just like the fuel tax at issue in Cougar Den I & II, taxes assessed pursuant to RCW 82.38.030(9)(a) impermissibly burden the Respondent’s treaty-protected Right to Travel.

Money is no excuse to undermine Tribal Treaty rights.  The least Ferguson and DOL can do at this point is finally recognize that they have lost their war against the Yakama People.  But will they now, or ever?  Or are they hoping for yet another battle at the U.S. Supreme Court, now reinforced with a bigger cadre of anti-tribal jurists?

 Joe Sexton is a partner with Galanda Broadman. His practice focuses on complex civil litigation defending indigenous rights and litigating tribal environmental and cultural resources disputes in federal, tribal, state, and administrative forums.  He has litigated indigenous civil rights matters on behalf of individuals and represents tribal governments outside of the courtroom in economic development and natural resources matters.   He has argued before the Washington State Supreme Court, the Washington Court of Appeals, and the United States District Court, and he has represented clients before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the U.S. Supreme Court.

[1] Galanda Broadman appeared and argued as amicus counsel on behalf of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation before the Washington State Supreme Court. 

[2]The ALJ chose more diplomatic language in its order granting Cougar Den summary judgment:  “The Department’s contention that taxes under RCW 82.38.030(9)(a) attach the moment fuel is removed from the rack, without being tied to travel at all . . . rests entirely upon its misapprehension, and misstatement of the law.” Straining to make their argument fit the law, the state twisted the statute’s language to claim that fuel is taxed when it is “removed at the rack.”  The statute’s language, however, uses language Ferguson’s team omitted from their brief in describing the taxable event: i.e., when fuel is  “removed from the rack.”  As the ALJ found, removing fuel “from the rack” —as the statute prescribes—requires travel.  This omission was certainly purposeful, and used in this case in a cynical effort to continue a fight against the Yakama Treaty that’s never been successful.